Pandem-onium

For starters, are you fully aware of how your immune system works? Here's a brief primer on the two complementary ways our bodies fight infection and build NATURAL IMMUNITY. {Missing image: chart comparing innate versus adaptive germ defense.}

Instead, the entire world has been forcefully pushed toward hastily-tested vaccines that notably "immunize" people differently than ever before. Worse yet, drugmakers are shielded from liability thanks to these products being rolled out during emergency use authorizations. {Missing image: article with the following Ruud Dobber quote, "This is a unique situation where we as a company simply cannot take the risk if in... four years the vaccine is showing side effects."}

The idea that we would mass-produce vaccines for old strains {instead of the old ones we predict will come} flies in the face of everything the medical community has done in the past. Honestly, I would argue that it borders on complete recklessness. Why, you ask? {Missing image: screenshots of a NYT explanation of our immune system and the Breakthrough newsletter's coverage of 70 years of flu vaccine methodology.}  

Want proof? It doesn't get more science-y than Science magazine. And it doesn't get more comprehensive than a medical database of 2.5 million people. People with natural immunity are apparently much safer than their vax counterparts over time. Ask yourself: is it more likely that these studies are wrong or that you have been fed half-truths and lies? {Missing image: screenshot of 8/26/21 Science article with Wadman in the byline claiming infections were 6-13 more likely in vaccinated folks than in unvaccinated.}  

This isn't hyperbole. I worry that the DNA hack I was bullied into injecting might cause lifelong harm; all so my community, who have been trained to dismiss any dissenting opinion as fake news, don't ostracize my kids. Meanwhile, the establishment can cavalierly brush off the chances this vax is camouflaging future variants from your own immune system. {Missing image: Medpage Today 3/16/21 antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) propaganda that is a sight to behold, in retrospect.}

Still not convinced? The media has finally begun to cover its behind by confirming the potentially huge downside of the current vax strategy. (Go check out Newsweek's 8/13/21 cover article for another example.) Of course, they still found a way to keep the narrative going... namely, by turning up the heat on their ultimate scapegoats... the unvaccinated. {Missing image: unclear source with following quote, "future strain could be as deadly as MERS - which has a case fatality rate of 35%"}

In fact, research already exists that proves dire consequences are distinctly possible. This is but one example of how your body might be reprogrammed in a detrimental way. Why is it ignored? Do they think you are too dumb to understand the complexities of a nuanced argument? Or do the anointed experts just want to decide your fate for you? {Missing image: News-medical.net article from 5/10/21 with "Research suggests Pfizer-BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine reprograms innate immune responses" headline.}

If we concentrated on age, society would be better off for it. Unfortunately, the media keeps pushing case counts to frighten us all. The same case counts that lack reliability above 30 cycles, according to the Nobel Prize INVENTOR of the PCR test we are forced to use. {Missing image: YouTube of Dr. Kary Mullis discussing PCR, with the following quote below, "if cycle thresholds cycle beyond 30 times, it means the viral fragments are so few that they are impossible to detect..."}  

No one in their right mind could seriously argue that contagious case counts are accurate. But what about the hospitalized? We've been told since this all began that we need to flatten the curve. That couldn't be exaggerated too, could it? Of course it could. Covid patients: under 5%. {Missing image: screenshot of a DCist article from 11/13/20 with a headline stating DC hospital capacity surpassed the 90% full mark. Expectedly, it buries the key metric... only 109 of the 2244 occupied beds were Covid-19 patients.}

That percentage only gets smaller when you consider how some hospitals have been guilty of padding the stats (supposedly there was a financial incentive to do so). The above is but one example of it. You would know about countless others if journalism wasn't compromised. {Missing image: when I said "the above," I was referring to a tweet citing Orlando Health's admission that when they cited 98% positivity, they meant to say 9.4%.}  

Let's not forget the parts government & big business have played during this crisis. Many elected officials seem to care more about who is in the White House than our literal lives & livelihoods. (1/21 headlines offer an easy litmus test.) As a result of their actions, Fortune 500 firms have flourished; small businesses, conversely, have been left holding the bag. {Missing image: various news headlines from 1/21/21.}

In case you thought I cherry-picked one awful policy, think again. Bureaucrats are hiding dangerous evidence. Look how they just STOPPED counting breakthroughs! Now you see how they could claim the unvaccinated are responsible for 99% of the case. (Supposedly, they lumped 2020 data from before any arms were jabbed to bolster their case.) {Missing image: screenshot of this Bloomberg headline regarding CDC's decision to pull the plug on tracking vaccinated people who still got sick.} 

Predictably, the campaign against the vaccine-hesitant immediately ramped up as soon as that authorization domino fell. Make no mistake, by weaponizing the scared & self-righteous against anyone who dares to question things, the forces behind the mandates get precisely what they want... no matter how stupid it looks when depicted graphically. {Missing image: self-created 2x2 vax/health status matrix where, for example, the "vaccinated & sick" person shrugs his shoulders saying, "oopsies, just a breakthrough."} 

Next, we were told that vaccination would also limit viral spread. I hate to break it to you, but that talking point was proven wrong, too; this time by scientists from the prestigious Oxford University. So, to recap, the vax doesn't fully protect you or curtail transmission. {Missing image: screenshot of 8/19/21 CBS News article written by Tucker Reals, "Delta infections carry as much virus as the unvaccinated."}

Even if you are lucky enough to avoid the hospital, being vaccinated and asymptomatic won't grant you any extra benefits. Quite simply, if any PCR test says you are infected, you still have to isolate in your room for 10 days - just like everyone you've been told to hate. {Missing image: screenshot of an 8/26/21 article from usnews.com with the title "You're vaccinated but get a breakthrough infection: what's next?" that includes the ten-day isolation reference from someone with the last name of Ostrosky.}

We're in the home stretch now... What many people don't know is that many governments NEVER could've authorized any of these jabs originally if there were other mitigation options available. Like, say, a Nobel-winning panacea that's been safely administered for decades to millions of people. Yes, it's time to discuss Ivermectin. {Missing image: screenshot of this Desert Review article claiming the wonder drug obliterated 97% of Delhi cases.}

Just in case you doubt the raw data (or the sources), we even have gold-standard studies to back up the hypothesis. Taking it one step further, experts believe that it works both as a preventative measure AND as a remedy for symptomatic patients. Yet Ivermectin is still treted like it's some sort of back alley drug. Or worse... {Missing image: article from jpost.com discussing double-blind study that caused Israeli scientist to go on record with the assertion that Covid could be treated for under $1/day!} 

What reason could authorities have for tamping down apparent known remedies? For goodness sake, they have proof that it helps on their own website!! Are doctors/ scientists/ experts all corrupt? Some are. Most just accept what they're told or don't have time to research the truth. The remaining few who might be willing to question things fear losing their jobs and/or reputations. In short, groupthink & cowardice rule the day. {Missing image: screenshot of Ivermectin research on NIH site by Hellwig & Maia.} 

As a brief aside, look at the peer-review process. Given what we know about the lack of bravery in the professional world, can you see how hard it would be for an alternative theorist to find colleagues to do a peer review? Taking it a step further, can you now imagine how easily the media (whether a random medical journal or a major newspaper) can silence the voices of academics who challenge entrenched notions? {Missing image: basic flowchart of the manuscript to publication process.} 

Meanwhile, established journalists now relegated solely to social media are routinely deplatformed for reporting inconvenient truths... like how government is still trying to push a vax that, in just a few short months, seems to be fighting a losing battle against Covid variants. {Missing image: Alex Berenson tweet about vaccine ineffectiveness.}

This propaganda-style disinformation campaign is precisely how the vaccination agenda marches on in the face of overwhelmingly questionable data. If anything, the drumbeat for shots in arms has increased both in frequency & intensity. In light of all this evidence, how could anyone still pretend we are being told the truth? {Missing image: 7/17/21 Zerohedge article about MRNA expert Robert Malone's honest opinion and related damning info from a 100% double-vaccinated Gibraltar.}

Natural immunity has been a bedrock of modern medicine, yet the "experts" have somehow forgotten this concept... even when prestigious institutions like the Cleveland Clinic have tried to remind them. {Missing image: article that includes the quote "individuals who have had SARS-CoV-2 infection are unlikely to benefit from COVID-19 vaccination."}

"Immunize" is in quotes for a reason. Unlike most vaccines (where adults immunization equals 1-2 shots per lifetime), COVID might be a 1x-2x per YEAR requirement - maybe forever. Note: the boosters seem calibrated to fight existing strains, which means they'll be injected in most folks LONG AFTER the virus has mutated well beyond that stage. {Missing image: Times of Israel screenshots of Israeli and Australian health leaders discussing how "this is our life from now on" and how we have to "get used to" it.}

In short, the pre-booster vaccines are narrowly designed to combat the original Covid-19. Sure, they did well againstr the first few mutations, since Alpha & Beta were fairly similiar to wild type. But, in mere months, efficacy has faded starkly. Each subsequent variant might make this trend exponentially worse, due to the girwing genetic gap between virus & vax. {Missing image: a diagram of the negative outcomes when broadly neutralizing antibodies are replaced by antibodies focused on one specific virus variant.}

Reduced efficacy isn't great, but it's not the main reason why this whole pandemic response is reckless. This is. When a former national head of vaccine development warns that these jabs might be enabling more dangerous strains & might be HIJACKING your own body's reaction to future variants, you should know. The fact that most folks don't scares me. {Missing image: unclear source with following quote, "only stimulates artificially induced antigen-specific antibodies and no natural killer (NK) cells..."}

Clearly doctors covering their butts with 'low likelihood' langauge doesn't instill confidence. Yet, that's nothing compared to legacy news publishing fact checks that don't even require you to leave the article to prove them false. (Headline says "no chance" despite text citing multiple studies.) If anything, this kind of coverage should be getting flagged. {Missing image: Reuters 2021 post with 'cytokine storm' in the headline.}

Before moving on, please remember that the vax "trojan horse" scenario is just one way it can hurt you. What if there are other long-term effects from it (or the boosters)? Everything you read will say this won't happen. What's their proof? SHORT-TERM INDICATORS. Seriously?! Can you see how ridiculous that sounds? {Missing image: screenshots of a 7/22/21 National Geographic article and a muhealth.org post that emphasizes experts having confidence in the "long-term safety" of the vaccine.}  

If 'experts' were truly trying to solve this crisis, they'd spend far less time bastardizing the unvaccinated (including kids) and, instead, focus on protecting senior citizens. Everyone and their grandma directionally knows that UNDER 5% of deaths have come from people under 50. {Missing image: unclear source with following age-specific infection fatality rate stats "0.002% at age 10 and 0.01% at 25... growing from 0.4% at 55 to around 15% at 85... it truly is an order of magnitude difference."}

As you saw in the last slide, Fauci has agreed for years that PCRs above 30 are virtually worthless. Yet, somehow, the 'experts' allowed thresholds of around 40 to persist throughout the pandemic (especially for the unvaccinated)... despite high false positive rates seen even at 25 cycles. {Missing image: unclear source with following quote, "the Infectious Diseases Society of America, found that at 25 cycles of amplification, 70% of PCR test "positives" are not "cases"... and by 35: 97%... are non-clinical."}

As it turns out, even the single-digit Covid intake percentages appear to be significantly inflated. If half of hospitalized Covid patients were barely ill, wouldn't better triage protocols double the number of moderately and severely sick patients hospitals could handle? {Missing image: screenshot of this 9/13/21 Atlantic article that discusses a study which showed nearly half of all cases were mild or asymptomatic.}

Oh, and just so you know, this isn't exclusively a pandemic phenomenon. The media has been scaring the public with this lack of capacity headline for years. The only difference this time is that their doom and gloom is leading to authoritarian policies that affect us all. The villagers eventually ignored the fabled boy who cried wolf. We should too. {Missing image: screenshot of a graphic titled "the winter NHS narrative" showing from The Guardian fearmongering about capacity every year from 2012-2019.}

Still, the real insidiousness happens at the unelected alphabet agency level. They're taking unprecedented steps to rig data points against the very public that pays their salaries. I'm not bloviating. OSHA is literally sweeping vax side effects under the rug. Now extrapolate this type of fraudulent reporting directive across the rest of government. Scary. {Missing image: unclear source with quote, "OSHA suspended the enforcement requirement to record adverse injuries until May 2022 in order to push the Covid shots."}

Thanks to all of these deceptions the MRNA vax was finally moved from emergency authorizations to full approval (without as much as a reconvening of the committee specifically designed for this purpose). Almost immediately after, the talk of forced mandates began in earnest. {Missing image: screenshot of this Washington Times headline, including mention of FDA not reconvening the VRBPAC to discuss final approval of one of the major vaccines.}

Let's take this step by step. For starters, you have to ask yourself why vaccinated people should fear the unvaccinated (including their own toddlers) if the jabs supposedly offer protection. That's the same question this Johns Hopkins School of Medicine professor is alluding to above. {Missing image: screenshot of cnsnews.com headline referencing the current FDA head saying the "unvaccinated pose no risk to the vaccinated beyond that of a common cold." Interestingly that article didn't appear anymore when I looked for it.}  

Really the only talking point remaining is that vaccination majorly reduces the chance someone will end up in the hospital. Well, that pillar is beginning to crumble as well. At what hospitalization rate will they be forced to abandon the "breakthrough" terminology? 30%? 40%? 50+%? {Missing image: recap in unknown source on 9/8/21of a Phil Shiver article discussing the rapidly increasing fully vaccinated hospitalizations and concerns about their "waning effectiveness."}

Final piece: when vax makers tout the effectiveness of their jabs, they get to blur in the natural immune response that would have occurred anyway. On the flip side, vax-hesitant folks get zero credit for this same basic principle since healthy-presenting people (who would have no reason to think they should get tested) aren't accurately tracked. {Missing image: reference to 9/20 PLOS Medicine analysis, "about 20% of people who become infected will remain asymptomatic throughout the infection."}

Before you dismiss the thought of reading any further, look at these results from around the globe. You don't have to be an immunologist to recognize that the drug was super effective in the places it was ALLOWED to be administered. {Missing image: screenshot of FLCCC Alliance breakdown and related charts demonstrating success in Paraguay.}

They want to hide the truth so badly that they're willing to pretend horse paste is the only form of the drug. Again, it must be stated that billions of these pills have been prescribed over the last few decades, precisely because of how safe & effective the medication is. So, how is this horse crap anything other than a blatant attempt to make anyone who proposes Ivermectin an idiot in the eyes of the uneducated masses? {Missing image: the infamous "You are not a horse. You are not a cow. Seriously, y'all. Stop it." tweet.

The media is also guilty of these same gross violations. For instance, after first ignoring Ivermectin advocates, the MSM soon resorted to publishing hit pieces meant to smash the alternative theory into oblivion. Even ridiculous trials (is it more likely researchers did or didn't want to prove it worked if the original parameters offered only ONE cumulative dose) get highlighted by major news outlets, as long as they fit the agenda. This would never happen with a study lacking peer review that challenged the narrative. {Link.}

Yes, the mainstream media has perfected the art of the pandemic shell game. When they're not busy defining 'misinformation' to suit their narrative, they're out there censoring proof that being vaccinated yields the same (or worse) results as the alternative. Even when they are caught red-handed, it doesn't matter. Like a hydra, when you defeat one head, two more pop up to take its place. {Missing image: Zerohedge 7/28/21 summation of a Becker News piece about info being scrubbed by the MSM.}

And it's not just journalists that are being removed. Actual doctors & scientists who dare to present a dissenting opinion are banned & vilified by 'fact checkers' & content moderators who have never even taken an EMT class, let alone treated patients. How have these anonymous entities become the arbiters of what is medically accurate? {Missing image: screenshots of article about Bakersfield doctors' video being removed from YouTube and a The Defender piece about Covid censorship.} 

In closing, it's undeniable that Big Pharma, legacy media, and the political class have created a power and profit stream for themselves out of thin air; while effectually shielding themselves from liability by working in lockstep. In other words, the burden will be borne solely by people like you and me. Don't you think it's time to admit you've been lied to? {Missing image: Fortune article about limited manufacturer liability screenshot.}

> Help topple their house of cards by spreading the truth. <